نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 Department of Plant Production and Genetics,, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
2 Department of Cereal Research, Agricultural and Natural Resources Researches Center of South Khorasan, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Birjand, Iran
چکیده
,In this study, two experiments were conducted to compare the performance of eight different genotypes, their correlations, path analysis, and select the best genotype/genotypes of barley in two environments including normal and saline environments in South Khorasan province of Iran in 2015-2016. Results of combined analysis of variance for combined data of both studied environments showed significant effects for the genotype treatment on most of the studied traits. Means comparison data indicated that the highest and the lowest means of majority of investigated characteristics of barley genotypes were related to Salt4 and MBS-90-10 genotypes, respectively. Number of days to maturity and plant height had the highest simple correlation with grain yield in investigated genotypes of barley but these correlations were not significant. In forward regression analysis for grain yield as independent variable, five traits including one-thousand grain weight, number of days to maturity, mean grain weight, canopy temperature, and plant height entered to regression model in five steps with R-square=0.99. The path coefficient analysis based on grain yield, as a dependent variable implicated that number of days to maturity had the highest positive direct effect on grain yield of investigated genotypes of barley. The highest positive indirect effect on the grain yield was related to the mean grain weight trough the number of days to maturity; therefore, these two traits were the most important phenological and morphological characteristics that affect grain yield of barley under two studied environments and can used as selection criteria in investigated genotypes of barley.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
Acosta-Motos, J. R., Ortuño, M. F., BernalVicente, A., Diaz-Vivancos, P., SanchezBlanco, M. J. & Hernandez, J. A. (2017). Plant responses to salt stress: adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy, 7(1), 18. https:// doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7010018
Alkharabsheh, H. M., Seleiman, M. F., Hewedy, O. A., Battaglia, M. L., Jalal, R. S., Alhammad, B. A. & Al-Doss, A. (2021). Field crop responses and management strategies to mitigate soil salinity in modern agriculture: A review. Agronomy, 11(11), 2299. https:// doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112299
Al-Tabbal, J.A. & Al-Fraihat, A.H. (2011). Genetic variation, heritability, phenotypic and genotypic correlation studies for yield and yield components in promising barley genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(3), 193-205.
Arenas-Corraliza, M. G., López-Díaz, M. L., Rolo, V., Cáceres, Y. & Moreno, G. (2022). Phenological, morphological and physiological drivers of cereal grain yield in Mediterranean agroforestry systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 340, 108158. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108158
Arif, Y., Singh, P., Siddiqui, H., Bajguz, A. & Hayat, S. (2020). Salinity induced physiological and biochemical changes in plants: An omic approach towards salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 156, 64-77.
Bhutta, M.A., Iqbal, J., Khaliq, I. & Sadaqat, H.A. (1991). Correlation and path coefcient analysis of some economic traits in six-rowed barley. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 1, 171-173.
Bhutta, W.M., Barley, T. & Ibrahim, M. (2005). Path-coefcient analysis of some quantitative characters in husked barley. Caderno de PesquisaSér. Bio., Santa Cruz do Sul, 17(1), 65-70.
Bidinger, F. R. & Witcombe J. R. (1989). Evaluation of specifc drought avoidance traits as selection criteria for improvement of drought resistance. In: Baker, F.W.G. (Ed.), Drought Resistance in Cereals, CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp. 51–63.
Blum A. (1988): Plant Breeding for Stress Environments, CRC Press, London.
Carpici, E.B. & Celik, N. (2012). Correlation and path coefcient analyses of grain yield and yield components in two-rowed of barley (Hordeum vulgare convar. distichon) varieties. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 4(2), 128-135.
Cary N. C. (2004). SAS Institute. The SAS system for windows. Release 9.1. SAS Inst, 654 p.
Cheng, X., Deng, G., Su, Y., Liu, J.J., Yang, Y., Du, G.H., Chen, Z.Y. & Liu, F.H. (2016). Protein mechanisms in response to NaCl-stress of salt-tolerant and saltsensitive industrial hemp based on iTRAQ technology. Industrial Crops and Products, 83, 444-452.
Chinnusamy, V., Jagendorf, A., & Zhu, J. K. (2005). Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop science, 45(2), 437-448.
El-Hashash, E. F. & El-Absy, K. M. (2019). Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) breeding. Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Cereals: Volume 5, 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23108-8_1
Flowers, T.J. (2004): Improving crop salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental botany, 55(396), 307-319.
Fraser, J. & Eaton, G.W. (1983). Application of yield component analysis to crop research. Field crop, 39, 787-797.
Godoy, F., Olivos-Hernández, K., Stange, C., & Handford, M. (2021). Abiotic stress in crop species: improving tolerance by applying plant metabolites. Plants, 10(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020186
Gondek, M., Weindorf, D. C., Thiel, C., & Kleinheinz, G. (2020). Soluble salts in compost and their effects on soil and plants: A review. Compost science & utilization, 28(2), 59-75.
Gul, Z., Tang, Z. H., Arif, M., & Ye, Z. (2022). An insight into abiotic stress and influx tolerance mechanisms in plants to cope in saline environments. Biology, 11(4), 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040597
Gupta, B. K., Sahoo, K. K., Ghosh, A., Tripathi, A. K., Anwar, K., Das, P., & Singla‐Pareek, S.L. (2018). Manipulation of glyoxalase pathway confers tolerance to multiple stresses in rice. Plant, Cell & Environment, 41(5), 1186-1200.
Jamshidi, A., & Javanmard, H. R. (2018). Evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes for salinity tolerance under feld conditions using the stress indices. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 2093-2099.
Jouyban, A. Sadeghi Give, H. & Noryan, M. (2015). Relationship between agronomic and morphological traits in barley varieties under drought stress condition. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 9(9), 1507-1511.
Liang, W., Ma, X., Wan, P., & Liu, L. (2018). Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: A review. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 495(1), 286-291.
Madakemogekar, A. H., Talekar, N. S., Kamboj, A. D., & Thakur, G. (2018). Scope of hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as a nutritious and medicinal food: A review. Acta Scientifc Agriculture, 2(12), 11-13.
Mamnouie, E., FotouhiGhazvini, R., Esfahani, M. & Nakhoda, B. (2006). The effects of water defcit on crop yield and the physiological characteristics of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 8, 211-219.
Mohammadi, H., Rahimpour, B., PirastehAnosheh, H., & Race, M. (2022). Salicylic acid manipulates ion accumulation and distribution in favor of salinity tolerance in Chenopodium quinoa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1576. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph19031576
Mohammadi, M. (2015). Character association and path analysis for selection criteria in barley breeding under rain fed conditions. Current Opinion in Agriculture, 4(1), 5-14.
Munns, R. & Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 59, 651-681.
Nguyen, V.L., Ribot, S.A., Dolstra, O., Niks, R.E., Visser, R.G. and van der Linden, C.G. (2013). Identifcation of quantitative trait loci for ion homeostasis and salt tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Molecular breeding, 31(1), 137-152.
Ober, E. S., Bloa, M. L., Clark, C. J. A., Royal, A., Jaggard, K. W. & Pidgeon, J. D. (2005). Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet. Field Crops Research, 91, 231–249.
Parida, A. K., & Das, A. B. (2005). Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 60(3), 324-349.
Piasecka, A., Kachlicki, P. & Stobiecki, M. (2019). Analytical methods for detection of plant metabolomes changes in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. International journal of molecular sciences, 20(2), 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020379
Qadir, M., Qureshi, A. S., & Cheraghi, S. A. M. (2008). Extent and characterization of salt‐affected soils in Iran and strategies for their amelioration and management. Land Degradation & Development, 19(2), 214-227.
Rahneshan, Z., Nasibi, F., & Moghadam, A.A. (2018). Effects of salinity stress on some growth, physiological, biochemical parameters and nutrients in two pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) rootstocks. Journal of plant interactions, 13(1), 73-82.
Rajabi Dehnavi, A., Zahedi, M., Ludwiczak, A., Cardenas Perez, S., & Piernik, A. (2020). Effect of salinity on seed germination and seedling development of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) genotypes. Agronomy, 10(6), 859. https:// doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060859
Raza, A., Tabassum, J., Fakhar, A. Z., Sharif, R., Chen, H., Zhang, C. & Varshney, R. K. (2022). Smart reprograming of plants against salinity stress using modern biotechnological tools. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 1-28. https://doi.org/10. 1080/07388551.2022.2093695
Ritchie, S.W., Nguyen, H.T., & Holaday, A.S. (1990). Leaf water content and gas‐exchange parameters of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance.Crop science,30(1), 105-111.
Rogel, J.A., Ariza, F.A., & Silla, R.O. (2000). Soil salinity and moisture gradients and plant zonation in Mediterranean salt marshes of Southeast Spain. Wetlands, 20(2), 357-372.
Roohi, E., Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Z., ModarresSanavy, S.A.M. & Siosemardeh, A. (2015). Association of some photosynthetic characteristics with canopy temperature in three cereal species under soil water defcit condition. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 17(5), 1233-1244.
Royo, C., Villegas, D., Del Moral, L.G., Elhani, S., Aparicio, N., Rharrabti, Y. & Araus, J.L. (2002). Comparative performance of carbon isotope discrimination and canopy temperature depression as predictors of genotype differences in durum wheat yield in Spain. Crop and Pasture Science, 53(5), 561-569.
Sadat Noori, S.A. (2005). Assessment for salinity tolerance through intergeneric hybridization: Triticum durum ×Aegilopsspeltoides. Euphytica, 146(1), 149-155.
Saeidinia, M., Beiranvand, F., Mumivand, H., & Mousavi, H.S. (2023). The effect of the salinity stress on the yield, morphological characteristics, essential oil and RWC of Satureja hortensis (case study: Khoramabad Iran). Journal of Drought and Climate change Research, 1(1), 97-108. 10.22077//JDCR.2023.6152.1017
Saneoka, H., Shiota, K., Kurban, H., Chaudhary, M. I., Premachandra, G.S., & Fujita, K. (1999). Effect of salinity on growth and solute accumulation in two wheat lines differing in salt tolerance. Soil science and plant nutrition, 45(4), 873-880.
Shahmoradi, H., & Naderi, D. (2018). Improving effects of salicylic acid on morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of saltimposed winter jasmine. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 5(2), 219-230.
Shokat, S., & Großkinsky, D.K. (2019). Tackling salinity in sustainable agriculture-What developing countries may learn from approaches of the developed world. Sustainability, 11(17), 4558.
Singh, M.K., Pandey, R.L. and Singh, R.P. (1987). Correlation and path coefcient analysis in barley grown on saline soil. Current Agriculture, 11(1-2), 55-58.
Walia, H., Wilson, C., Condamine, P., Liu, X., Ismail, A.M. & Close, T.J. (2007). Large‐scale expression profling and physiological characterization of jasmonic acid‐mediated adaptation of barley to salinity stress. Plant, Cell & Environment, 30(4), 410-421.
Witzel, K., Weidner, A., Surabhi, G.K., Varshney, R.K., Kunze, G., Buck‐Sorlin, G.H., Boerner, A. & Mock, H.P. (2010). Comparative analysis of the grain proteome fraction in barley genotypes with contrasting salinity tolerance during germination. Plant, cell & environment, 33(2), 211-222.
Yang, X., Chen, J., Ma, Y., Huang, M., Qiu, T., Bian, H. & Wang, J. (2022). Function, mechanism, and application of plant melatonin: An update with a focus on the cereal crop, barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Antioxidants, 11(4), 634. https://doi. org/10.3390/antiox11040634
Zaefzadeh, M., Ghasemi, M., Azimi, J., Khayatnezhad, M. & Ahadzadeh, B. (2011). Correlation analysis and path analysis for yield and its components in hulless barley. Advances in Environmental Biology, 5(1), 123-126.
Zhao, C., Zhang, H., Song, C., Zhu, J. K., & Shabala, S. (2020). Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. The innovation, 1(1), 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. xinn.2020.100017
Zhaoyong, Z., Abuduwaili, J., & Yimit, H. (2014). The occurrence, sources and spatial characteristics of soil salt and assessment of soil salinization risk in Yanqi Basin, Northwest China. PLoS One, 9(9), e106079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0106079
Zurqani, H., Mikhailova, E., Post, C., Schlautman, M., & Sharp, J. (2018). Predicting the classes and distribution of salt-affected soils in Northwest Libya. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 49(6), 689-700.
)